Photobucket

September 27, 2011

GIVEAWAY ENTRY PAGE "CLAIM OF INNOCENCE" ENDED

SEPTEMBER 27th to OCTOBER 11th, 2011

CLAIM OF INNOCENCE
by LAURA CALDWELL

SYNOPSIS:
  Forbidden relationships are the most tempting. And the most dangerous.
  It was a crime of passion-or so the police say. Valerie Solara has been charged with poisoning her best friend. The prosecution claims she's always been secretly attracted to Amanda's husband...and with Amanda gone, she planned to make her move.
  Attorney Izzy McNeil left the legal world a year ago, but a friend's request pulls her into the murder trial. Izzy knows how passion can turn your life upside down. She thought she had it once with her ex-fiance, Sam. Now she wonders if that's all she has in common with her criminally gorgeous younger boyfriend, Theo.
  It's Izzy's job to present the facts that will exonerate her client-whether or not she's innocent. But when she suspects Valerie is hiding something, she begins investigating-and uncovers a web of secret passions and dark motives, where seemingly innocent relationships can prove poisonous...


THANKS TO ERIN AND THE AWESOME  
PEOPLE FROM MEDIA MUSCLE
 I HAVE TWO (2 ) COPIES OF THIS
SUSPENSEFUL BOOK TO GIVE AWAY.
HERE IS WHAT YOU NEED TO DO TO WIN.
 *ALL COMMENTS TO BE SEPARATE*
AND INCLUDE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
SO THAT I CAN CONTACT YOU IF YOU WIN
*LEAVE COMMENT: COULD YOU DEFEND SOMEONE
IF YOU THOUGHT THEY MIGHT BE GUILTY?*
 
*EXTRA ENTRIES*
*LEAVE SEPARATE COMMENT IF YOU PUBLICLY FOLLOW  THIS
  BLOG (IF NOT, GOOGLE FRIEND CONNECT ON RIGHT SIDE).


*LEAVE SEPARATE COMMENT IF YOU FOLLOW ME ON FACEBOOK.


*LEAVE SEPARATE COMMENT IF YOU FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER.

*REMEMBER TO INCLUDE EMAIL ADDRESS FOR ALL ENTRIES. 
*U.S. AND CANADA RESIDENTS ONLY*
*NO P.O. BOXES*
**HONOR SYSTEM**
ONE WINNING BOOK PER HOUSEHOLD
PLEASE NOTIFY ME IF YOU HAVE
WON THIS BOOK FROM ANOTHER
SITE, SO THAT SOMEONE ELSE MAY
HAVE THE CHANCE TO WIN
AND READ THIS BOOK.
THANK YOU.
*GIVEAWAY ENDS OCTOBER 11th AT 6PM EST*
 WINNER WILL BE CHOSEN BY RANDOM.ORG AND NOTIFIED
VIA EMAIL AND WILL HAVE 48 HOURS TO RESPOND
OR ANOTHER NAME WILL BE CHOSEN

DISCLAIMER / RULES

Giveaway copies are supplied and shipped to winners via publisher,
agent and/or author.  This blog hosts the giveaway on behalf of the
above.  I received a copy of this book, at no charge to me, in
exchange for my honest review.  No items that I receive are
ever sold...they are kept by me, or given to family and/or friends.

I am not responsible for lost or damaged books that are shipped

from agents.  I reserve the right to disqualify/delete any entries

if rules of giveaway are not followed




25 comments:

Terrie said...

Yes, I'm a follower and always enjoy your reviews.
tpurk@earthlink.net

Terrie said...

Would I defend someone I thought was guilty? While I certainly don't think innocent folks should be punished, a vigorous defense for the innocent necessitates a vigorous defense for everyone.

That being said, I think the law is so often manipulated so that truly guilty people aren't punished,and I don't agree with that. So, I guess my conclusion is that I wouldn't defend someone I knew to be guilty - even though I support their right to that defense. Whew!
tpurk@earthlink.net

Maureen said...

I could defend someone if I thought they were guilty since I would be guilty of malpractice if I didn't.
mce1011 AT aol DOT com

mamabunny13 said...

No, I could not.
mamabunny13 at gmail dot com

mamabunny13 said...

I follow you via gfc
mamabunny13 at gmail dot com

Marjorie/cenya2 said...

Nope, never, I could never defend someone if I felt they were guilty.
I believe in being honest.

cenya2 at hotmail dot com

Marjorie/cenya2 said...

I follow by google reader as cenya2.

cenya2 at hotmail dot com

Marjorie/cenya2 said...

I follow you on facebook as Marjorie Roy.

cenya2 at hotmail dot com

Linda Kish said...

If I really believed someone was guilty, I couldn't defend them.

lkish77123 at gmail dot com

Linda Kish said...

I am a GFC follower

lkish77123 at gmail dot com

Unknown said...

I am a follower and email subscriber. Tore923@aol.com

Unknown said...

I couldn't defend someone if I thought they were guilty. If they were really guilty and got off I couldn't live with myself especially if they murdered someone.Please enter me in contest. Tore923@aol.com

Literary Chanteuse said...

I do not think I could. I'd rather be crown lawyer for that reason.

Margaret
singitm@hotmail.com

Literary Chanteuse said...

I'm a GFC follower

Margaret
singitm@hotmail.com

donnas said...

I dont know that I could.

bacchus76 at myself dot com

donnas said...

GFC follower

bacchus76 at myself dot com

donnas said...

follow on facebook - Donna S

bacchus76 at myself dot com

donnas said...

twitter follower - @donnas1

bacchus76 at myself dot com

Angela - Bookaunt said...

I am not sure that I could defend someone who I knew was guilty. I have worked for a prosecutor's office so my mind has been trained to think the other way.

Thank you for the chance to win.

griperang at embarqmail dot com

Angela - http://griperangsbookmarks.blogspot.com

Angela - Bookaunt said...

I am a new public follower to your blog via gfc - griperang

Thank you for the chance to win

Angela - http://griperangsbookmarks.blogspot.com

Patricia said...

Yes, I could defend someone I thought was guilty.

patricia dot mariani dot esq at gmail dot com

Patricia said...

Follow via GFC
patricia dot mariani dot esq at gmail dot com

Patricia said...

Follow on FB

patricia dot mariani dot esq at gmail dot com

Patricia said...

follow on Twitter (@CapitalismRox)
patricia dot mariani dot esq at gmail dot com

ewhatley said...

Tough question. According to our legal system, everyone is entitled to a trial by jury, but I think I would make a better prosecutor than defense attorney.

mybeachylife at gmail dot com